Centralization vs Local Management of PR and Advertising: Which Model to Choose?

The question of centralizing public relations (PR) and advertising is crucial. Twenty years ago, when Mepax started offering international PR services, most companies managed these activities locally, either through their own teams or by hiring local agencies in each country. While this model still exists, the current trend is clearly shifting towards the centralization of international communications activities.

Some companies still choose to manage PR locally, expecting better relationships with local media and publishing houses. However, in practice, the difference between local and centralized management is often minimal.

The Limitations of Local Management

Fewer and fewer companies are opting for a separate PR agency for each market, and the reasons are clear:

• High costs: Accumulating multiple agency retainers can triple or quadruple the budget compared to using a single agency managing multiple countries.
• Organizational complexity: Coordinating and tracking multiple local agencies is time-consuming and complicates the implementation of global reporting.
• Inconsistencies in messaging: Localized management can result in discrepancies in communication strategies and inconsistent PR performance across different countries.

Some companies handle PR internally within each country. While it may work in some cases, this approach often brings hidden challenges:

• Lack of expertise and resources: Not all subsidiaries have trained personnel with the time and skills to efficiently manage PR.
• Hidden costs: Although internal management avoids direct expenses, it still requires significant time and resources that could be better allocated elsewhere.
• Performance tracking challenges: Analyzing media performance indicators, especially in the digital realm, requires specialized skills and tools that few companies possess internally.

The Advantages of Centralization

At Mepax, we firmly believe that centralizing international PR activities is the optimal solution. Here’s why:

• Cost efficiency and streamlined processes: A single point of contact simplifies management and optimizes expenses.
• Consistent messaging: A unified communication strategy ensures a cohesive brand image across all markets.
• Localized execution: Centralization does not mean rigid standardization; content and journalist interactions remain tailored to each country.
• Higher and more consistent media coverage: PR performance is better controlled and more effective.
• Access to up-to-date and actionable data: Precise tracking of media performance allows for optimized advertising investments.
• Real-time global reporting: A comprehensive dashboard simplifies tracking and performance analysis.

A Centralized Approach with Local Adaptation

We recognize the benefits of local PR and advertising management and adapt our services accordingly. Our solutions enable businesses to maintain a localized approach while benefiting from the advantages of centralized organization.

• Involvement of local subsidiaries: We communicate with your local teams in their native language and consider their specific needs.
• Localized writing and validation: Content is adapted for target markets and reviewed by native experts.
• Optimized time for local teams: By relieving them of operational tasks, they can focus on high-value activities such as journalist meetings.

Monitoring and Analyzing Local Efficiency

At Mepax, we have developed tools to measure the effectiveness of local PR activities. Our clients receive real-time reporting for each region, along with precise tracking of journalist engagement with press releases. We identify key media outlets in each country and ensure that the content is received and used appropriately.

Additionally, we arrange one-on-one meetings between local teams and journalists to strengthen communication and maximize PR impact. This ensures that even with centralized management, local teams remain involved and active.

Conclusion

Centralizing PR and advertising offers numerous advantages in terms of cost efficiency, effectiveness, and consistency. However, a flexible approach that integrates local needs maximizes these benefits. At Mepax, we are committed to offering the best of both worlds: an optimized international strategy while ensuring local market considerations are fully addressed.

Top of the page